On December 11, the Chronicle of Higher Ed article “New Data Show Articles by Women Cited Less Frequently” by Megan O’Neil, caused anthropologists, Virginia Dominguez, Matthew Gutmann and Catherina Lutz, to look introspectively at the discipline of anthropology. In the article, O’Neil notes “Research papers and peer-reviewed articles written principally by women are cited less frequently than those whose dominant authors are men, compounding the underrepresentation of women in scholarly publishing, according to a new study.”
Dominguez, Gutmann and Lutz agree with O’Neil in their Anthropology News article, released today, “Problem of Gender and Citations Raised Again in New Research Study”, these anthropologists recognize that the citation problems are not only prevalent in the fields O’Neil reveals (computer science, engineering, mathematics), but also in anthropology itself.
Although O’Neil’s article focuses on gender disparities, anthropologists note that “(t)his issue is not restricted to questions of gender and should also be extended to race and other forms of distinction.” While strides have been made over the years to bring women to the forefront of the discipline, “(i)t is a question of citing top scholarship in all our work, and explicitly recognizing that this process must include vigilance against bias of all kinds related to factors like gender, race, class, and nationality.” In pledging their citation vigilance, the authors call their colleagues and the institutions to action in augmenting citations of all top scholarship.
Read the entire article “Problem of Gender and Citations Raised Again in New Research Study” at http://www.Anthropology-News.org.